mac on linux /super user mode

[Matt Zimmerman]

On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 12:10:31PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:

> On Sun, Sep 26, 2004 at 08:37:52AM -0400, Junior Gagn? wrote:
> > and does mac on linux will be add for the official version
>
> It should be added to Supported at least; it's a fantastic tool. We'd
> need to upgrade the kernel modules for our kernels, though.

The right way to handle the modules would be to add them to our kernel, so
they're always in sync. It's getting a bit late to add new kernel stuff for
Warty, though. If we want it in, it needs to happen now.

--
- mdz

[Colin Watson]

On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 10:57:20AM -0700, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 12:10:31PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 26, 2004 at 08:37:52AM -0400, Junior Gagn? wrote:
> > > and does mac on linux will be add for the official version
> >
> > It should be added to Supported at least; it's a fantastic tool. We'd
> > need to upgrade the kernel modules for our kernels, though.
>
> The right way to handle the modules would be to add them to our kernel, so
> they're always in sync.

They probably need to be in sync with both the kernel and mol itself, so
I'm not sure moving them is a big win.

> It's getting a bit late to add new kernel stuff for Warty, though. If
> we want it in, it needs to happen now.

Let's defer to Hoary then.

--
Colin Watson [cjwatson@canonical.com]

[Colin Watson]

On Sun, Sep 26, 2004 at 08:37:52AM -0400, Junior Gagn? wrote:
> and does mac on linux will be add for the official version

It should be added to Supported at least; it's a fantastic tool. We'd
need to upgrade the kernel modules for our kernels, though.

--
Colin Watson [cjwatson@canonical.com]