View Full Version : request XFE 0.84
aboe
July 7th, 2005, 01:21 AM
can you please backport XFE 0.84
http://roland65.free.fr/xfe/index.php?page=download
Xfe 0.84 requires the FOX 1.4.x library and neither works with FOX 1.0.x, nor FOX 1.2.x, nor FOX 1.5.x!
don't know if it is in breezy but I would sure like it backported...
compared to rox this file-manager is easier, smaller and faster
Darrena
July 7th, 2005, 11:18 AM
That looks interesting, there is a debian package posted on their site so I may try that...
aboe
July 7th, 2005, 02:43 PM
the debian package didn't install with my setup...
aboe
July 7th, 2005, 03:29 PM
xfe 7.2-6 is in breezy...maybe that one can be backported...it has the following deps:
libc6 (http://packages.ubuntu.com/breezy/base/libc6) (>= 2.3.4-1)GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone data
http://packages.ubuntu.com/Pics/dep.gif libfox1.2Package not available
http://packages.ubuntu.com/Pics/dep.gif libgcc1 (http://packages.ubuntu.com/breezy/libs/libgcc1) (>= 1:4.0-0pre6ubuntu4)GCC support library
http://packages.ubuntu.com/Pics/dep.gif libpng12-0 (http://packages.ubuntu.com/breezy/libs/libpng12-0) (>= 1.2.8rel)PNG library - runtime
http://packages.ubuntu.com/Pics/dep.gif libstdc++5 (http://packages.ubuntu.com/breezy/base/libstdc++5) (>= 1:3.3.4-1)The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ubuntu_demon
July 8th, 2005, 05:23 PM
xfe 7.2-6 is in breezy...maybe that one can be backported...it has the following deps:
libc6 (http://packages.ubuntu.com/breezy/base/libc6) (>= 2.3.4-1)GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone data
http://packages.ubuntu.com/Pics/dep.gif libfox1.2Package not available
http://packages.ubuntu.com/Pics/dep.gif libgcc1 (http://packages.ubuntu.com/breezy/libs/libgcc1) (>= 1:4.0-0pre6ubuntu4)GCC support library
http://packages.ubuntu.com/Pics/dep.gif libpng12-0 (http://packages.ubuntu.com/breezy/libs/libpng12-0) (>= 1.2.8rel)PNG library - runtime
http://packages.ubuntu.com/Pics/dep.gif libstdc++5 (http://packages.ubuntu.com/breezy/base/libstdc++5) (>= 1:3.3.4-1)The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
hoary has libc6 version : 2.3.2.ds1-20ubuntu13
So backporting from breezy is not an option (unless hacking a bit works :-P)
Also what about rox-filer ? That's a lightweigh filemanager too.
jdong
July 8th, 2005, 07:05 PM
XFE probably does build for Hoary. I'll try that backport now.
Note that some dependencies (like libc and other libraries) are generated at build-time, depending on the build system's libraries.
jdong
July 8th, 2005, 07:06 PM
CORRECTION:
libfox1.2-dev is not available in Hoary... So no, it won't build
ubuntu_demon
July 8th, 2005, 07:30 PM
Note that some dependencies (like libc and other libraries) are generated at build-time, depending on the build system's libraries.
I didn't know that. Why can't they make the ubuntu package database more precise then ?(just curious)
aboe
July 9th, 2005, 03:30 AM
libfox 1.2 comes from the foxtoolkit...
but thanks for trying...
I liked xfe better than rox...cause it is easier to work with.
it is more consistent with the interface.
aboe
July 9th, 2005, 06:43 AM
libfox1.2-dev (http://packages.ubuntu.com/breezy/libdevel/libfox1.2-dev) (1.2.13-1.1ubuntu1) [universe]Development files for the FOX C++ GUI Toolkit : is in breezy http://packages.ubuntu.com/breezy/allpackages
so can you please try again....building it with hoary deps...please
rwabel
July 9th, 2005, 10:35 PM
I would also like to test the new version for xfe. if you can backport, it would be cool! thanks
aboe
July 12th, 2005, 08:37 AM
I build the xfe7.2 breezy version with the ubp-build-script..:
just added the breezy sources...to my apt-sourceslist
and first build the libfox1.2dev package..
and then the xfe7.2 package...
they installed fine...and I have working XFE 7.2 on my system build with for hoary
Dax0r
July 16th, 2005, 06:27 AM
I liked xfe better than rox...cause it is easier to work with.
it is more consistent with the interface.
Xfe looks like windows explorer...I dont like it.
I prefer evidence http://evidence.sourceforge.net/features.html
rwabel
July 16th, 2005, 07:48 AM
Xfe looks like windows explorer...I dont like it.
I prefer evidence http://evidence.sourceforge.net/features.html
xfe has 2 panels! that's the main reason. Every one that has 1 panel like "nautilus, konqueror, evidence etc are more looking like explorer. I don't understand why they don't implement the 2 panel thing. It's the most effective way to work with file.
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.