View Full Version : Fedora Core 6 Now Has Linux Kernel 2.6.19
deweese
January 18th, 2007, 11:53 PM
Wow this Fedora is really advancing fast. I switched to it from Edgy Eft. I love it.
The Linux kernels are more updated than Ubuntu. See for yourself.
2.6.19 is here today! I am just bragging.
siucdude
January 19th, 2007, 12:50 AM
That is fine. Ubuntu Feisty has 2.6.20-5. Good luck with fedora
deweese
January 19th, 2007, 02:23 AM
Thank you very much. Btw, I was referring to STABLE. :-)
The latest stable version of the Linux kernel is: 2.6.19.2 2007-01-10 19:11 UTC F V VI C Changelog
see www.kernel.org
xabbott
January 21st, 2007, 01:22 AM
What does this matter? Whatever is released last will have the latest kernel. OR *gasp* you can compile the latest kernel yourself for any distro. Or use something like Arch :biggrin: and always have the lastest kernel...
po0f
January 21st, 2007, 01:24 AM
xabbott,
I think the point deweese was trying to make is that FC continue to update/upgrade the kernel throughout a release, as opposed to Ubuntu's stance of just releasing the same kernel version with security patches applied as an update.
xabbott
January 21st, 2007, 08:02 PM
xabbott,
I think the point deweese was trying to make is that FC continue to update/upgrade the kernel throughout a release, as opposed to Ubuntu's stance of just releasing the same kernel version with security patches applied as an update.
Ah, true. ](*,)
Although, I wouldn't call this Ubuntu's stance. Slackware, Suse, Debian, and generally those based on them do this. The only distros I know that constantly update all packages are Gentoo, Archlinux, and rPath. I'm sure there are others but I can't remember or don't know of them. Is this common for Red Hate/Fedora? Or was this due to a severe bug/exploit?
po0f
January 21st, 2007, 11:35 PM
xabbott,
It has been common since FC5 (I've only used 5 and 6), and I'm sure it will continue. I'm sure at some point Dapper will get a kernel upgrade. One, 2.6.15 is ancient; and two, it is an LTS release (could you imagine using 2.6.15 2 years from now? :D).
Since Dapper is the first LTS release, I'm guessing that Ubuntu hasn't decided on a kernel upgrade strategy yet. I'll try to dig up some info on it.
givré
January 24th, 2007, 08:49 PM
xabbott,
It has been common since FC5 (I've only used 5 and 6), and I'm sure it will continue. I'm sure at some point Dapper will get a kernel upgrade. One, 2.6.15 is ancient; and two, it is an LTS release (could you imagine using 2.6.15 2 years from now? :D).
RHEL4 still use 2.6.9 you know...
Upgrading a kernel could lead to regression, and that's why the ubuntu policy is to not upgrade kernel.
However, they apply security patch and upgrade drivers when possible.
Insomniac20k
January 27th, 2007, 05:05 PM
What's the advantage of upgrading the kernel constantly? Does it change all that much
Rodneyck
January 28th, 2007, 08:42 PM
What's the advantage of upgrading the kernel constantly? Does it change all that much
Better hardware support and detection for one.
xabbott
January 29th, 2007, 12:03 PM
Better hardware support and detection for one.
The kernel doesn't handle hardware detection.
pissedoffdude
February 2nd, 2007, 01:38 AM
Yeah I had a pretty big problem when I updates the kernel. I wouldn't be able to boot as grub wouldn't load. It would just say GRUB: and it wouldn't go anywhere. I was able to use the rescue disk to reinstall grub but still it shouldn't have made that mistake.
vBulletin® v3.8.1, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.