View Full Version : Which is easier?
November 8th, 2006, 04:27 AM
Idk, I'm sure its been thought of.
But what's easier:
Emulating directx, or actually embedding directx support into Linux.
IDK, I'm kinda bored.
November 8th, 2006, 05:11 AM
porting to opengl
November 8th, 2006, 05:18 AM
DirectX is a layer on top of the ati/intel/nvidia drivers which are all based on opengl.
I don ged it why stupid games companies don't make games in opengl anyway since it avoids an abstracted layer. strikes me a being lazy.
DirectX is heathen as far as programming it in wine, I've been debugging a DX3 issue for ages but it's just absurd the amount of complications and exceptions they've put in. without documenting most of them.
November 8th, 2006, 06:46 AM
So directx is an extra layer? Over already opengl drivers?!
November 8th, 2006, 07:22 AM
DirectX makes programming easer I assume. Calling functions of the graphics cards manually would be a more complex task to program.
Just wildly guessing.
November 8th, 2006, 07:23 AM
It's the processors (GPUs) to the graphics cards, OpenGL has been built and designed by the Graphics Chip makers as a graphics standard.
you didn't think it just came out of thin air did you.
DirectX does provide other things like Mouse, Keyboard, Joystick and a few other extras all bundeled into one include. sort of like SDL Game platform but with their own 3D jiggery pokery to make things dificult to cause vendor lock in.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.2 Copyright © 2015 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.