View Full Version : Can't create link w/o admin privs
jamesisin
February 18th, 2010, 02:37 AM
I am working out a problem in library access for Rhythmbox and am using (on other machines with other users) a link to .gvfs/share in the user's Music folder:
/home/[username]/.gvfs/name of share
The problem that I run into is that when I attempt to do that for a non-priv'ed user I get a link to / (what?). Anything under .gvfs (or .gvfs itself) behaves this way. I tried drag/drop a link and right-click —> Make Link with the same results.
Then I tried just running Nautilus as a priv'ed user (su [username], gksudo nautilus) but nautilus was not able to spawn (I had my doubts about that one).
So, I guess next I'll try creating the link manually. Can someone confirm this syntax?
ln /home/[username]/.gvfs/share\ on\ server /home/[username]/Music/LinkName
jamesisin
February 18th, 2010, 03:00 AM
I read the ln man page and am confused concerning hard and soft links. I then read both articles at Wikipedia (interesting enough), but that didn't clear up the confusion.
Which is the kind of link I create when I drag/drop a file/folder (with ctrl-shift)?
linuxman94
February 18th, 2010, 03:24 AM
Did you try
sudo ln /home/[username]/.gvfs/share\ on\ server /home/[username]/Music/LinkName?
jamesisin
February 18th, 2010, 03:29 AM
Yeah. (I just didn't mention sudo.)
I ended up using the -s argument, but I still have no idea if a symbolic link is a 'normal' link or if I should in fact be using a hard link.
I'm still a little confused why the un-priv'ed user could not create a link from one item under their /home directory to another.
Bakerconspiracy
February 18th, 2010, 08:53 AM
You can't create a hard link to a directory. A hard link is like having the same file in two different places. If you delete a hard link then you delete the file in memory too.
You can only soft link a directory.
I'm pretty sure you are doing everything right
jamesisin
February 18th, 2010, 09:29 AM
It was the comments (at Wikipedia) about the recursive problem with hard links which made me choose the soft link. It has the correct link symbol, so that's a good sign. (I understand it is possible to create hard links to directories but ill advised.)
Bakerconspiracy
February 18th, 2010, 10:17 AM
(I understand it is possible to create hard links to directories but ill advised.)
I was accidentily trying to do that earlier, and 'ln' was spitting back an error. You are probably right though, maybe with the correct flags.
But as far as I know (as you probably already know), creating a hardlink is a pointer to memory, whereas a sym link is reference to an absolute path. So this gets kind of weird when you start hard linking directories.
I might be reiterating the same thing you have said.
jamesisin
February 18th, 2010, 10:15 PM
Yeah, I don't know how to do it. I just remember reading along the way that it was possible but not recommended.
I still don't know what the difference between "a pointer to memory" and a "reference to an absolute path" might actually mean. I understand the words, but what are they trying to get at?
jamesisin
February 19th, 2010, 02:24 AM
And if anyone can answer me why an un-priv'ed user can not create a link from one item under their /home directory to another location in their /home directory, my life would be complete.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0 Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.