PDA

View Full Version : [SOLVED] ubuntuzilla.py: where is it?



watchpocket
February 1st, 2010, 01:35 AM
Looking at my user.log in the System Log Viewer, I see this line:

Jan 31 16:00:01 rj-home UBUNTUZILLA: /bin/sh: /usr/local/bin/ubuntuzilla.py: Permission denied

Looking in /usr/local/bin/, there is no ubuntuzilla.py

Okay, so it's a Python script and I need to look in a python directory to check perms? But which one?

nanotube
February 1st, 2010, 04:21 AM
Looking at my user.log in the System Log Viewer, I see this line:

Jan 31 16:00:01 rj-home UBUNTUZILLA: /bin/sh: /usr/local/bin/ubuntuzilla.py: Permission denied

Looking in /usr/local/bin/, there is no ubuntuzilla.py

Okay, so it's a Python script and I need to look in a python directory to check perms? But which one?

post your output of
ls -al /usr/local/bin

and also try
dpkg -l ubuntuzilla
and

dpkg -L ubuntuzilla

watchpocket
February 1st, 2010, 04:57 AM
post your output of
ls -al /usr/local/binand also try
dpkg -l ubuntuzillaand

dpkg -L ubuntuzilla

I do have the sipie.py script (for Sirius/XM) working successfully, and those are the files in /usr/local/bin.

--> sudo ls -al /usr/local/bin
[sudo] password for rj:
total 32
drwx------ 2 root root 4096 2010-01-03 02:15 .
drwxr-xr-x 10 root root 4096 2010-01-03 02:15 ..
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 278 2010-01-03 02:15 cliSipie
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 270 2010-01-03 02:15 gtkSipie
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 192 2010-01-03 02:15 sipie.py
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 99 2010-01-03 02:15 testall.sh
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 195 2010-01-03 02:15 to3.sh
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 268 2010-01-03 02:15 wxSipie


--> dpkg -l ubuntuzilla
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Inst/Cfg-files/Unpacked/Failed-cfg/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend
|/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name Version Description
+++-===================================-===================================-================================================== ====================================
rc ubuntuzilla 4.8.3-0ubuntu1 Ubuntuzilla - Mozilla software installer for Ubuntu


--> dpkg -L ubuntuzilla
/etc
/etc/cron.daily
/etc/cron.daily/ubuntuzillaupdatecron
/usr/localThanks.

llamabr
February 1st, 2010, 05:01 AM
weird. Also try:


locate ubuntuzilla

watchpocket
February 1st, 2010, 05:05 AM
--> sudo locate ubuntuzilla
[sudo] password for rj:
/etc/cron.daily/ubuntuzillaupdatecron
/var/lib/apt/lists/switch.dl.sourceforge.net_project_ubuntuzilla_apt_ dists_all_Release
/var/lib/apt/lists/switch.dl.sourceforge.net_project_ubuntuzilla_apt_ dists_all_Release.gpg
/var/lib/apt/lists/switch.dl.sourceforge.net_project_ubuntuzilla_apt_ dists_all_main_binary-amd64_Packages
/var/lib/dpkg/info/ubuntuzilla.list

dolphinaura
February 1st, 2010, 05:08 AM
seems like it isn't installed properly.
and im guessing that the package name is ubuntuzilla (im not sure, im on mac osx right now)


sudo dpkg --purge ubuntuzilla


and try installing it again.

nanotube
February 1st, 2010, 06:01 AM
status 'rc' means the package has been removed, but configuration files remain.

just run the 'dpkg --purge' command provided above, or use
sudo apt-get remove --purge ubuntuzilla

to remove the config files, which would also remove the cron job which tries to call the now non-existent ubuntuzilla.py.

watchpocket
February 1st, 2010, 06:11 AM
But would I then want to reinstall it? I mean, is ubuntuzilla a name for Firefox?

Or what is ubuntuzilla exactly? (I know it's a project encompassing seeral things, but what is it as it appears on my machine?)

Thanks.

watchpocket
February 1st, 2010, 06:43 AM
Ubuntuzilla purged & reinstalled. Thanks to all.

"The Ubuntuzilla script provides an easy way to install the latest releases of Mozilla software (Firefox, Thunderbird, Seamonkey), on Ubuntu Linux, with minimal disturbance to the system."

nanotube
February 1st, 2010, 03:36 PM
yes, the ubuntuzilla script is an installer for official mozilla builds.

there's now an ubuntuzilla repository for the mozilla software, but only for 32bit, since mozilla only makes 32bit builds.

but i see from some output above that you're on 64bit, so not suggesting it. :)