echo314
November 10th, 2009, 11:54 AM
I'm going to purchase a Wildebeest, almost for sure this time. Like 99%. I really like the i7 8xx procs compared to the Core 2 Quads (although I admit I have had trouble finding easily comparable benchmarks), but why does it stop at a 9600GT graphics card? It seems this system would be perfect for something like a GTS 250, like the Wild Dog has optioned. Thomas, I know you kinda answered my question already, that the Wildebeest was meant to be between the Ratel and Wild Dog in price and performance, but I have more questions! Is this the case so that Sys76 can have another filler comp (in a good sense, smoothing transitions between comp models) between those to for completeness purposes, (ie. the graphics card options were set lower purposefully), or perhaps the drivers are wonky atm? I'm really leaning toward getting the Wildebeest and then just upgrading the card later. I was just wondering why the graphics options were limited, since I would rather purchase it with a more powerful card out of the box and the Wildebeest certainly seems capable of taking on the Wild Dog.
Can Sys76 install the GTS 250 (or similar card) on the Wildebeest? (ie. any custom order option?)
Thanks for any insight you can provide, and for putting up with my wall of text! I know you don't necessarily have access to all the information.
Can Sys76 install the GTS 250 (or similar card) on the Wildebeest? (ie. any custom order option?)
Thanks for any insight you can provide, and for putting up with my wall of text! I know you don't necessarily have access to all the information.