oygle
August 20th, 2009, 06:06 AM
I was advised in another thread to uninstall Firestarter, as it is no loner supported. That is okay with me, as it has given problems in the past. The suggestion was to install Gufw.
I recorded all the Firestarter rules and policies, then uninstalled Firestarter, then installed Gufw. Opened it up, and had to 'enable' it, seems okay. ......... BUT there are no 'rules' defined.
Yet, when I checked iptables ..
# sudo iptables -L -n -v
it showed up all the Firestarter rules, which I would expect, as Firestarter is only a Gui for iptables.
What I would like to see is those 'rules', in Gufw.
I'm able to use the internet, email, and the syslogs are showing the usual ports being blocked, so everything seems to be running okay.
It just would be nice to be able to see those rules. I notice there is an import in Gufw, but I have no idea what the format of that files is. There seems to be absolutely no documentation for Gufw.
Is there a "safe" method to remove all those (Firestarter generated) rules from iptables, and then add them with Gufw, as I notice outbound ports are being blocked ?
Thanks,
Oygle
I recorded all the Firestarter rules and policies, then uninstalled Firestarter, then installed Gufw. Opened it up, and had to 'enable' it, seems okay. ......... BUT there are no 'rules' defined.
Yet, when I checked iptables ..
# sudo iptables -L -n -v
it showed up all the Firestarter rules, which I would expect, as Firestarter is only a Gui for iptables.
What I would like to see is those 'rules', in Gufw.
I'm able to use the internet, email, and the syslogs are showing the usual ports being blocked, so everything seems to be running okay.
It just would be nice to be able to see those rules. I notice there is an import in Gufw, but I have no idea what the format of that files is. There seems to be absolutely no documentation for Gufw.
Is there a "safe" method to remove all those (Firestarter generated) rules from iptables, and then add them with Gufw, as I notice outbound ports are being blocked ?
Thanks,
Oygle