tgilbert328
June 10th, 2009, 11:11 AM
I'd like your opinions, I have been having an internal debate on what is the better route.
I am a Windows Developer at my company and use Visual Studio 2008 every day. However, I also use Ubuntu as a virtual on that machine and use it occasionally. I am reasonably happy with this.
However, I recently partitioned my work computer and created a small Linux partition. I was curious about ext4 and whether I could get everything working on my XPS 1330.
Well, it worked very well firstly, my entire 4gb was addressable (using 64-bit), performance seemed better (in linux) with ext4. Easier access to internet radio, ability to use compiz, etc.
This has tempted me to reverse my virtualization situation.
Linux host with vista Virtual vs Vista host and Linux virtual
Has anyone had any experience? opinions?
I am a Windows Developer at my company and use Visual Studio 2008 every day. However, I also use Ubuntu as a virtual on that machine and use it occasionally. I am reasonably happy with this.
However, I recently partitioned my work computer and created a small Linux partition. I was curious about ext4 and whether I could get everything working on my XPS 1330.
Well, it worked very well firstly, my entire 4gb was addressable (using 64-bit), performance seemed better (in linux) with ext4. Easier access to internet radio, ability to use compiz, etc.
This has tempted me to reverse my virtualization situation.
Linux host with vista Virtual vs Vista host and Linux virtual
Has anyone had any experience? opinions?