bbruecker
May 12th, 2009, 05:02 PM
Since I updated 9.04 Nautilus makes me angry.
It eats CPU-Time. Every time I browse a folder with some more subdirectories or a different partition nautilus assumes 80-90 percent of CPU. Why? What's going on?
Examples:
Pressing Ctrl+L: 5 to 8 seconds
Pressing Ctrl+T for a new tab 10 seconds
changing from symbol to list view: to 10 seconds
Displaying Content of my data-partition: 12 seconds
closing that proggy: 5 to 15 seconds, sometimes there is an warning: "File-Browser is not responding"
I'm not amused. It seems after update only boot process is faster.
Nothing of that helped:
questioning my logs: no errors reported
disabling previews
deleting content of .nautilus and .thumbnails folders
activate nvidea or deactivate nvidea binary graphic
activate or deactivate compiz
checking hardisk-performance:
Timing cached reads: 720 MB in 2.00 seconds = 359.83 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 138 MB in 3.02 seconds = 45.64 MB/sec
Isn't that bad for a pata-disk.
PCMan Filemanager displays the content of the same folders quickly. (But I have some other issues with that proggy.)
Strange: My slower netbook computer is faster doing same operations with 9.04.
Any further ideas?
Benjamin
It eats CPU-Time. Every time I browse a folder with some more subdirectories or a different partition nautilus assumes 80-90 percent of CPU. Why? What's going on?
Examples:
Pressing Ctrl+L: 5 to 8 seconds
Pressing Ctrl+T for a new tab 10 seconds
changing from symbol to list view: to 10 seconds
Displaying Content of my data-partition: 12 seconds
closing that proggy: 5 to 15 seconds, sometimes there is an warning: "File-Browser is not responding"
I'm not amused. It seems after update only boot process is faster.
Nothing of that helped:
questioning my logs: no errors reported
disabling previews
deleting content of .nautilus and .thumbnails folders
activate nvidea or deactivate nvidea binary graphic
activate or deactivate compiz
checking hardisk-performance:
Timing cached reads: 720 MB in 2.00 seconds = 359.83 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 138 MB in 3.02 seconds = 45.64 MB/sec
Isn't that bad for a pata-disk.
PCMan Filemanager displays the content of the same folders quickly. (But I have some other issues with that proggy.)
Strange: My slower netbook computer is faster doing same operations with 9.04.
Any further ideas?
Benjamin